Skip to content
AmarilloBudget · Contracts · Debt

Storyline · 15 events · Nov 8, 2016 – Sep 29, 2026

Amarillo's property tax rate and voter-approved debt (2016-2026)

Each year the Amarillo City Council adopts a property tax rate made of a maintenance-and-operations (M&O) part and a debt-service (interest-and-sinking, I&S) part. In November 2016 voters approved two of seven bond propositions (streets and public safety). The total rate went from $0.35072 per $100 (FY2016/17) to $0.43070 (FY2025/26 and FY2026/27); the debt-service part went from $0.02374 to $0.10658 per $100 over the same span. In 2021 the council proposed $0.48404, voters rejected it at a Nov 2 tax rate election, and the rate became the $0.44334 voter-approval rate. In 2026 staff recalculated the rates after errors were found in figures sent to the county tax offices; council kept $0.43070 on a 4-1 vote.

A storyline groups dated events in order. It is a chronology, not an argument; it does not say why anything happened. All storylines

Where the story starts depends on the framing

  1. · Origin

    Voters approve 2 of 7 City bond propositions (streets, public safety)

    In a seven-proposition, roughly $340 million bond election, Amarillo voters approved the streets ($89.5M) and public safety ($20.1M) propositions and rejected five others totaling $230M (municipal facilities, neighborhood parks, Civic Center, fleet, athletics). The City said the approved bonds would be paid through tax-supported debt.[1][2]

    • ✓ Verified

      The November 8, 2016 City bond election had seven propositions totaling about $340 million.[2][1]

      Amount
      $340,000,000
      Propositions
      7
      Comparator
      approximately
    • ✓ Verified

      Voters approved the streets and public safety propositions; the approved total is given as $109 million by the City and as $89.5M + $20.1M by HPPR.

      Reported value 1[2]

      Amount
      $109,000,000

      City budget document: 'Propositions 1 and 2 ... in the total amount of $109 million'

      Reported value 2[1]

      Streets
      $89,500,000
      Public safety
      $20,100,000
      Total
      $109,600,000

      HPPR per-proposition amounts (sum computed)

    • ✓ Verified

      Five propositions totaling $230 million (municipal facilities, neighborhood parks, Civic Center, city fleet, athletic facilities) were rejected.[1]

      Amount
      $230,000,000
      Propositions
      5
    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo (Nov 9, 2016 press release, as reported by HPPR): Per a City press release cited by HPPR, both approved propositions were to be paid through tax-supported debt over five years.[1]

  2. · Precursor

    FY2017/18 rate set at $0.36364 after first 2016-bond issue

    The total rate went from $0.35072 (FY2016/17) to $0.36364 per $100. The City issued the first of the 2016-election general obligation bonds ($21,280,000) in April 2017; its budget documents tie the FY2017/18 increase to that issue.[2][3]

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2017/18 rate was $0.36364 per $100 ($0.32698 general, $0.03666 debt), up from $0.35072 in FY2016/17 ($0.32698 general, $0.02374 debt).[3][2]

      Rate per 100
      $0.36364 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.32698 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.03666 per $100
      Prior rate per 100
      $0.35072 per $100
      Prior is rate per 100
      $0.02374 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: In April 2017 the City issued $21,280,000 in general obligation bonds, the first of five planned annual issues for the 2016 voter-approved projects; the City's budget narrative relates the FY2017/18 rate increase to this issue.[2]

      Amount
      $21,280,000
  3. · Related development

    FY2018/19 rate set at $0.36838 after second 2016-bond issue

    The total rate went from $0.36364 to $0.36838 per $100, with the debt-service part going from $0.03666 to $0.04140. The City issued the second 2016-election GO bond ($22,145,000) in July 2018.[2][3][4]

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2018/19 rate was $0.36838 per $100 ($0.32698 general, $0.04140 debt).[3][4]

      Rate per 100
      $0.36838 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.32698 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.04140 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: In July 2018 the City issued the second 2016-election GO bond, $22,145,000; the City's budget narrative relates the FY2018/19 rate increase to this issue.[2]

      Amount
      $22,145,000
  4. · Related development

    FY2019/20 rate set at $0.38851; budget adopted 4-1

    The rate went from $0.36838 to $0.38851 per $100 ($0.34448 M&O, $0.04403 debt service). The City described the M&O increase as funding Fire and Animal Management positions tied to the 2016 public-safety proposition plus street maintenance, and the I&S increase as debt service on the voter-approved bonds. Council adopted the budget 4-1, Councilmember Elaine Hays against.[2][5][4]

    Ginger NelsonElaine Hays

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2019/20 rate was $0.38851 per $100, up from $0.36838: +$0.0175 M&O and +$0.00263 debt service.[2][4][5]

      Rate per 100
      $0.38851 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.34448 per $100
      Prior rate per 100
      $0.36838 per $100
    • ⚠ Sources differ

      The FY2019/20 debt-service rate is $0.04403 per $100 in the City budget; ABC7 printed it as $0.4403.

      Reported value 1[2][3]

      Is rate per 100
      $0.04403 per $100

      City budget book and historical rate table

      Reported value 2[5]

      Is rate per 100
      $0.44030 per $100

      As printed by ABC7 (inconsistent with its own $0.38851 total; apparent typographical error)

    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: The City's budget states the M&O increase funds Fire and Animal Management and Welfare personnel tied to the voter-approved Proposition 2 projects plus street maintenance, and the I&S increase is for debt service on the voter-approved bond projects.[2][5]

    • ✓ Verified

      The proposed FY2019/20 budget estimated total tax collections of $49,018,465, an increase of $3,029,641 from 2018.[5]

      Amount
      $49,018,465
      Levy change
      $3,029,641
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2019/20 budget was adopted 4-1: Mayor Ginger Nelson and Councilmembers Freda Powell, Eddy Sauer and Howard Smith for; Councilmember Elaine Hays against.[2]

      For
      4
      Against
      1
  5. · Related development

    FY2020/21 rate set at $0.39681; budget adopted 5-0

    The rate went from $0.38851 to $0.39681 per $100; the debt-tax rate went from $0.04976 to $0.05921 as listed in the City's statutory notice. The budget raised $1,931,428 (3.89%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 5-0.[6][4]

    Ginger Nelson

    • ✓ Verified

      FY2020/21: rate $0.39681 (prior $0.38851); no-new-revenue rate $0.38070; voter-approval rate $0.41586; debt tax rate $0.05921 (prior $0.04976).[6][4]

      Rate per 100
      $0.39681 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.38070 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.41586 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.05921 per $100
      Prior rate per 100
      $0.38851 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2020/21 budget raised $1,931,428 (3.89%) more in property tax than the prior year; $528,990 from new property.[6]

      Levy change
      $1,931,428
      Levy change
      3.89%
      New property
      $528,990
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2020/21 budget was adopted 5-0 (Mayor Nelson; Councilmembers Hays, Powell, Sauer, Smith).[6]

      For
      5
      Against
      0
    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo FY2020/21 budget document: The City's budget states the FY2020/21 increase was in the I&S portion, related to the 2016 voter-approved bond projects, the Thompson Park pool replacement, and a downtown South Johnson Street property purchase.[6]

  6. · Starting point

    Council proposes $0.48404 rate, above the voter-approval rate, triggering an election

    Council voted to set a proposed ceiling of about 48 cents per $100, above the $0.44334 voter-approval rate, which under state law required a November election. Councilmember Cole Stanley was the only vote against.[7][8][9]

    Cole StanleyGinger Nelson

    • ✓ Verified

      For FY2021/22 the City proposed $0.48404 per $100; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.38884 and the voter-approval rate $0.44334.[8]

      Rate per 100
      $0.48404 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.38884 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.44334 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      Councilmember Cole Stanley was the only vote against setting the proposed rate ceiling of about 48 cents; Stanley said he did not oppose what the money would fund.[7][9]

    • ⚠ Sources differ

      The proposed increase was described as 22 percent (NewsChannel10) and 24 percent (Texas Scorecard, Amarillo Pioneer).

      Reported value 1[7]

      Increase
      22%

      Reported value 2[9][10]

      Increase
      24%
  7. · Trigger

    FY2021/22 budget adopted 4-1; election set for Nov 2

    The FY2021/22 budget was adopted 4-1 with Councilmember Cole Stanley against. The City's materials said the proposed rate's additional revenue would fund police, fire, streets and parks; the City CFO described the election as putting the decision with voters.[8][7][11][12]

    Cole StanleyGinger NelsonLaura Storrs

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2021/22 budget was adopted 4-1: Mayor Ginger Nelson and Councilmembers Powell, Sauer and Smith for; Councilmember Cole Stanley against.[8]

      For
      4
      Against
      1
    • ✓ Verified

      Laura Storrs, Assistant City Manager and CFO: "Instead of our elected officials making the decision, they're putting it more in the hands of the tax payers, the voters."[11]

    • ✓ Verified

      Laura Storrs, Assistant City Manager and CFO (quote); NewsChannel10 (estimates): The City CFO said that under state law the rate would increase either way; NewsChannel10 estimated a $100,000 home would pay just under $8/month more if the measure passed and a little under $4/month more if it failed.[12]

    • ✓ Verified

      City of Amarillo FY2021/22 budget document: The City's budget states the $0.48404 rate would have generated an additional $4.8 million for Parks & Recreation capital, public safety personnel and equipment, wage increases and street improvements.[8]

      Amount
      $4,800,000
  8. · Peak

    Voters reject Proposition A; rate becomes the $0.44334 voter-approval rate

    Voters rejected the proposed $0.48404 rate by a reported 55-45 margin in both Potter and Randall counties. The FY2021/22 rate became $0.44334 per $100 (the voter-approval rate), up from $0.39681.[10][9][8][4]

    • ✓ Verified

      Voters rejected Proposition A, the $0.48404 rate, on Nov 2, 2021, by a reported 55-45 margin, with both Potter and Randall counties voting against.[10][9][8]

      For
      45%
      Against
      55%
    • ✓ Verified

      After the failed election the FY2021/22 rate was $0.44334 per $100 (the voter-approval rate), up from $0.39681; the debt tax rate was $0.07911.[8][4][3]

      Rate per 100
      $0.44334 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.36423 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.07911 per $100
      Prior rate per 100
      $0.39681 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2021/22 budget (at the revised rate) raised $7,024,921 (13.49%) more in property tax than the prior year; $702,794 from new property.[8]

      Levy change
      $7,024,921
      Levy change
      13.49%
      New property
      $702,794
    • ✓ Verified

      Vote for Kids Amarillo PAC supported Proposition A (park repairs, public safety); Save Amarillo PAC opposed it, saying there was no clear plan for the revenue.[10][9]

  9. · Related development

    FY2022/23 rate set at $0.40628 (4-0)

    Council approved the FY2022/23 budget and rate 4-0 (one member absent). The rate went from $0.44334 to $0.40628 per $100 ($0.07549 debt service). Council had earlier considered a rate near 49 cents that included Civic Center renovation funding.[13][14][4]

    Ginger NelsonCole Stanley

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2022/23 rate is reported as 40 cents (ABC7) and $0.40628 per $100 (City).

      Reported value 1[13]

      Rate per 100
      $0.40000 per $100

      Rounded in news coverage ('4-cents lower than the current rate')

      Reported value 2[14][4][3]

      Rate per 100
      $0.40628 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.33079 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.07549 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.39694 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.49086 per $100

      City statutory notice and rate tables

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2022/23 budget and rate were approved 4-0, with Councilmember Eddy Sauer absent.[13][14]

      For
      4
      Against
      0
      Absent
      1
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2022/23 budget raised $1,587,957 (2.62%) more in property tax than the prior year; $740,251 from new property.[14]

      Levy change
      $1,587,957
      Levy change
      2.62%
      New property
      $740,251
    • ✓ Verified

      Council had earlier considered a rate of about 49 cents that included Civic Center renovation funding; ABC7 reported that project was tied up in litigation.[13]

  10. · Related development

    FY2023/24 rate set at $0.39195 (5-0)

    The rate went from $0.40628 to $0.39195 per $100 ($0.07751 debt service). The budget raised $4,026,731 (6.46%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 5-0; the same budget included fee increases in several utilities and services.[15][16][4]

    Cole StanleyLes SimpsonJosh CraftDon Tipps

    • ✓ Verified

      FY2023/24: rate $0.39195 (prior $0.40628); no-new-revenue $0.37598; voter-approval $0.39867; debt tax rate $0.07751.[15][4][16]

      Rate per 100
      $0.39195 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.31444 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.07751 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.37598 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.39867 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2023/24 budget raised $4,026,731 (6.46%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,388,601 from new property.[15]

      Levy change
      $4,026,731
      Levy change
      6.46%
      New property
      $1,388,601
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2023/24 budget was adopted 5-0 (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Josh Craft, Don Tipps, Tom Scherlen, Les Simpson).[15][16]

      For
      5
      Against
      0
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2023/24 budget included fee increases for drainage, solid waste, sewer, water, environmental health, golf, tennis, aquatics, zoo admission, athletics and city marshal.[16]

  11. · Related development

    FY2024/25 rate set at $0.38723 (4-0)

    The rate went from $0.39195 to $0.38723 per $100 ($0.31867 M&O, $0.06856 debt service), equal to that year's voter-approval rate. The budget raised $3,654,631 (5.43%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 4-0 with one member absent.[17][18]

    Cole StanleyLes SimpsonJosh CraftDon Tipps

    • ✓ Verified

      FY2024/25: rate $0.38723 ($0.31867 M&O, $0.06856 debt); no-new-revenue $0.36659; voter-approval $0.38723.[17][18]

      Rate per 100
      $0.38723 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.31867 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.06856 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.36659 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.38723 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2024/25 budget raised $3,654,631 (5.43%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,279,505 from new property.[17]

      Levy change
      $3,654,631
      Levy change
      5.43%
      New property
      $1,279,505
    • ✓ Verified

      The 2024 statutory notice lists $12,853,341 in tax-supported debt service, less $1,653,515 excess prior-year collections, for a total debt levy of $11,199,827.[18]

      Debt service
      $12,853,341
      Debt levy
      $11,199,827
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2024/25 budget was adopted 4-0 (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Josh Craft, Don Tipps, Tom Scherlen), with Councilmember Les Simpson absent.[17]

      For
      4
      Against
      0
      Absent
      1
  12. · Related development

    FY2025/26 rate set at $0.43070 (5-0)

    Council unanimously adopted a $0.43070 rate (from $0.38723), equal to the voter-approval rate; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.37355. The debt-service part went from $0.06856 to $0.09956 and the M&O part from $0.31867 to $0.33114. The budget notice states property-tax revenue rises $8,475,975 (11.77%).[19][20][3][21][22]

    Cole StanleyLes SimpsonTim ReidDon TippsDavid PrescottLaura Storrs

    • ✓ Verified

      FY2025/26: rate $0.43070 ($0.33114 M&O, $0.09956 debt); no-new-revenue $0.37355; voter-approval $0.43070; prior rate $0.38723.[19][3]

      Rate per 100
      $0.43070 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.33114 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.09956 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.37355 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.43070 per $100
      Prior rate per 100
      $0.38723 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      From FY2024/25 to FY2025/26 the debt-service part went from $0.06856 to $0.09956 (+$0.03100) and the M&O part from $0.31867 to $0.33114 (+$0.01247).[3]

      Is change per 100
      $0.03100 per $100
      Mo change per 100
      $0.01247 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2025/26 property-tax increase is stated as $8,475,975 (11.77%) in the budget notice, $8.4 million (11.77%) by the City release, and nearly $8.5 million by NewsChannel10; the hearing notice's total levy on all properties rises $7,648,192 (10.58%).

      Reported value 1[3]

      Levy change
      $8,475,975
      Levy change
      11.77%
      New property
      $1,245,224

      LGC 102.007 budget notice: revenue from property taxes vs last year's budget

      Reported value 2[20]

      Levy change
      $8,400,000
      Levy change
      11.77%

      City news release (rounded)

      Reported value 3[21]

      Levy change
      $8,500,000
      Comparator
      approximately

      NewsChannel10 ('nearly $8.5 million')

      Reported value 4[19]

      Levy total prior
      $72,268,651
      Levy total
      $79,916,843
      Levy change
      $7,648,192
      Levy change
      10.58%

      Truth-in-taxation hearing notice: total tax levy on all properties, 2024 vs 2025 tax year

    • ✓ Verified

      The 2025 hearing notice estimates City tax on the average homestead going from $838.28 to $975.36 (+$137.08, 16.35%), with average homestead taxable value rising from $216,481 to $226,040.[19]

      Prior
      $838
      Amount
      $975
      Change
      $137
      Change
      16.35%
    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2025/26 budget and tax rate were adopted unanimously (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Tim Reid, Don Tipps, David Prescott, Les Simpson) on Sept 16, 2025.[20][3][19][21]

      For
      5
      Against
      0
    • ✓ Verified

      Mayor Cole Stanley: "The money is there, it's now stewardship."[21]

    • ✓ Verified

      Councilmember David Prescott: "Costs have gone up, they're going up in areas that we never expected."[21]

  13. · Trigger

    Staff propose a $0.44728 voter-approval rate for FY2026/27; NNR is $0.42170

    At a budget workshop, staff proposed the voter-approval rate of $0.44728; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.42170. Councilmember Les Simpson asked to explore the budget at the no-new-revenue rate. Coverage reported total City debt of $566.8 million, about half for water and sewer.[23]

    Les SimpsonCole StanleyGrayson Path

    • ✓ Verified

      Staff proposed the $0.44728 voter-approval rate for the 2026 tax year; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.42170, below the 2025 rate of $0.43070.[23]

      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.44728 per $100
      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.42170 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      The Tribune reported total City debt of $566.8 million, almost 50% for water and sewer, with annual debt service at 10.8% of the proposed budget and about $7.3 million rolling off after FY2026/27.[23][24]

      Amount
      $566,800,000
  14. · Related development

    Rates recalculated after errors in figures sent to tax offices; ceiling set at $0.4307

    At a special meeting, staff presented recalculated rates after errors were found in numbers used to calculate them (debt figures, a fleet debt item, and a TIRZ value deduction). The voter-approval rate rose to $0.45252; the no-new-revenue rate stayed $0.42170. After several failed motions, council set a not-to-exceed rate of $0.4307 (Stanley, Reid and Tipps for; Simpson against all motions).[24][25]

    Cole StanleyLes SimpsonTim ReidDon TippsDavid PrescottAndrew Freeman

    • ✓ Verified

      The Tribune reported the original rates used debt collection numbers more than $2 million too high, counted $1.1 million in fee-paid fleet debt in general revenue, and double-deducted TIRZ value (about $1.2 million for the upcoming budget).[24]

    • ✓ Verified

      After recalculation the no-new-revenue rate stayed $0.42170 and the voter-approval rate rose $0.00508 to $0.45252.[24]

      No new revenue rate per 100
      $0.42170 per $100
      Voter approval rate per 100
      $0.45252 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      Potter County Tax Assessor-Collector: The Potter County tax assessor-collector said the incorrect number appeared, based on his office's internal research, to have been provided by City staff.[24]

    • ✓ Verified

      Mayor Cole Stanley: "They were essentially taking that value and deducting it from our revenues twice."[24]

    • ✓ Verified

      Simpson's motion to cap the rate at the no-new-revenue rate got no second; after three failed motions, Stanley, Reid and Don Tipps voted to set the not-to-exceed rate at $0.4307. Simpson voted against every motion.[24][25]

      Not to exceed rate per 100
      $0.43070 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      Councilmember Les Simpson: "I really think we owe it to the taxpayers to provide relief to them and that's the budget I'm going to be looking for."[25]

  15. · Resolution

    FY2026/27 rate adopted at $0.43070 (4-1)

    Council adopted the FY2026/27 budget and a $0.43070 rate ($0.32412 M&O, $0.10658 debt service), the same total as FY2025/26, by 4-1 votes with Councilmember Les Simpson against. The City says the budget raises $2,063,963 (2.58%) more in property tax, including $1,295,675 from new property.[26][27][28]

    Les SimpsonCole Stanley

    • ⚠ Sources differ

      The FY2026/27 rate is $0.43070 per $100, the same total as FY2025/26; the proposed budget book and the adoption release give different M&O/I&S splits.

      Reported value 1[26][28]

      Rate per 100
      $0.43070 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.32412 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.10658 per $100

      Adopted split, City release of Sept 30, 2026 (also ABC7)

      Reported value 2[29]

      Rate per 100
      $0.43070 per $100
      Mo rate per 100
      $0.33714 per $100
      Is rate per 100
      $0.09356 per $100

      Proposed budget book dated 09-24-26 (before final adoption)

    • ✓ Verified

      The FY2026/27 budget raises $2,063,963 (2.58%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,295,675 from new property. The City says the rate will effectively be raised by 2.9 percent and raise M&O taxes on a $100,000 home by about $9.[26][29][28]

      Levy change
      $2,063,963
      Levy change
      2.58%
      New property
      $1,295,675
    • ✓ Verified

      All FY2026/27 budget and tax-rate votes were 4-1, with Councilmember Les Simpson against.[26][27]

      For
      4
      Against
      1
    • ✓ Verified

      The City's release states the $0.43070 rate is 'greater than the current rate' (statutory wording), while the Tribune describes it as the same rate as 2025.[26][27]

    • ✓ Verified

      The debt-service (I&S/I&R) part of the City rate went from $0.02374 per $100 in FY2016/17 to $0.10658 in FY2026/27.[3][26]

      Is rate fy2016 17 per 100
      $0.02374 per $100
      Is rate fy2024 25 per 100
      $0.06856 per $100
      Is rate fy2025 26 per 100
      $0.09956 per $100
      Is rate fy2026 27 per 100
      $0.10658 per $100
    • ✓ Verified

      Texas Comptroller data record City of Amarillo general obligation principal of $123,738,733 in FY2016 and $212,736,000 in FY2025 ($622.91 and $1,044.21 per capita).[30]

      Go principal fy2016
      $123,738,733
      Go principal fy2025
      $212,736,000
      Per capita fy2016
      $623
      Per capita fy2025
      $1,044

Related storylines: Financing the Amarillo Civic Center expansion and renovation (2016-2026)Amarillo's wastewater plants: failures, enforcement, expansion financing and rate increases (2022-2026)Moving Amarillo City Hall into the renovated Amarillo Hardware building (2016-2025)Downtown TIRZ #1 and Local Government Corporation financing (2006-2026)