Storyline · 15 events · Nov 8, 2016 – Sep 29, 2026
Amarillo's property tax rate and voter-approved debt (2016-2026)
Each year the Amarillo City Council adopts a property tax rate made of a maintenance-and-operations (M&O) part and a debt-service (interest-and-sinking, I&S) part. In November 2016 voters approved two of seven bond propositions (streets and public safety). The total rate went from $0.35072 per $100 (FY2016/17) to $0.43070 (FY2025/26 and FY2026/27); the debt-service part went from $0.02374 to $0.10658 per $100 over the same span. In 2021 the council proposed $0.48404, voters rejected it at a Nov 2 tax rate election, and the rate became the $0.44334 voter-approval rate. In 2026 staff recalculated the rates after errors were found in figures sent to the county tax offices; council kept $0.43070 on a 4-1 vote.
A storyline groups dated events in order. It is a chronology, not an argument; it does not say why anything happened. All storylines
Where the story starts depends on the framing
- Rate changes since the 2016 voter-approved bonds: starts with Voters approve 2 of 7 City bond propositions (streets, public safety) (Nov 8, 2016)
- The 2021 tax rate election: starts with Council proposes $0.48404 rate, above the voter-approval rate, triggering an election (Jul 29, 2021)
- The 2026 rate recalculation: starts with Staff propose a $0.44728 voter-approval rate for FY2026/27; NNR is $0.42170 (Aug 13, 2026)
· Origin
Voters approve 2 of 7 City bond propositions (streets, public safety)
In a seven-proposition, roughly $340 million bond election, Amarillo voters approved the streets ($89.5M) and public safety ($20.1M) propositions and rejected five others totaling $230M (municipal facilities, neighborhood parks, Civic Center, fleet, athletics). The City said the approved bonds would be paid through tax-supported debt.[1][2]
- ✓ Verified
The November 8, 2016 City bond election had seven propositions totaling about $340 million.[2][1]
- Amount
- $340,000,000
- Propositions
- 7
- Comparator
- approximately
- ✓ Verified
Voters approved the streets and public safety propositions; the approved total is given as $109 million by the City and as $89.5M + $20.1M by HPPR.
- ✓ Verified
Five propositions totaling $230 million (municipal facilities, neighborhood parks, Civic Center, city fleet, athletic facilities) were rejected.[1]
- Amount
- $230,000,000
- Propositions
- 5
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo (Nov 9, 2016 press release, as reported by HPPR): Per a City press release cited by HPPR, both approved propositions were to be paid through tax-supported debt over five years.[1]
· Precursor
FY2017/18 rate set at $0.36364 after first 2016-bond issue
The total rate went from $0.35072 (FY2016/17) to $0.36364 per $100. The City issued the first of the 2016-election general obligation bonds ($21,280,000) in April 2017; its budget documents tie the FY2017/18 increase to that issue.[2][3]
- ✓ Verified
The FY2017/18 rate was $0.36364 per $100 ($0.32698 general, $0.03666 debt), up from $0.35072 in FY2016/17 ($0.32698 general, $0.02374 debt).[3][2]
- Rate per 100
- $0.36364 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.32698 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.03666 per $100
- Prior rate per 100
- $0.35072 per $100
- Prior is rate per 100
- $0.02374 per $100
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: In April 2017 the City issued $21,280,000 in general obligation bonds, the first of five planned annual issues for the 2016 voter-approved projects; the City's budget narrative relates the FY2017/18 rate increase to this issue.[2]
- Amount
- $21,280,000
· Related development
FY2018/19 rate set at $0.36838 after second 2016-bond issue
The total rate went from $0.36364 to $0.36838 per $100, with the debt-service part going from $0.03666 to $0.04140. The City issued the second 2016-election GO bond ($22,145,000) in July 2018.[2][3][4]
- Rate per 100
- $0.36838 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.32698 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.04140 per $100
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: In July 2018 the City issued the second 2016-election GO bond, $22,145,000; the City's budget narrative relates the FY2018/19 rate increase to this issue.[2]
- Amount
- $22,145,000
· Related development
FY2019/20 rate set at $0.38851; budget adopted 4-1
The rate went from $0.36838 to $0.38851 per $100 ($0.34448 M&O, $0.04403 debt service). The City described the M&O increase as funding Fire and Animal Management positions tied to the 2016 public-safety proposition plus street maintenance, and the I&S increase as debt service on the voter-approved bonds. Council adopted the budget 4-1, Councilmember Elaine Hays against.[2][5][4]
- ✓ Verified
The FY2019/20 rate was $0.38851 per $100, up from $0.36838: +$0.0175 M&O and +$0.00263 debt service.[2][4][5]
- Rate per 100
- $0.38851 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.34448 per $100
- Prior rate per 100
- $0.36838 per $100
- ⚠ Sources differ
The FY2019/20 debt-service rate is $0.04403 per $100 in the City budget; ABC7 printed it as $0.4403.
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo FY2019/20 budget document: The City's budget states the M&O increase funds Fire and Animal Management and Welfare personnel tied to the voter-approved Proposition 2 projects plus street maintenance, and the I&S increase is for debt service on the voter-approved bond projects.[2][5]
- ✓ Verified
The proposed FY2019/20 budget estimated total tax collections of $49,018,465, an increase of $3,029,641 from 2018.[5]
- Amount
- $49,018,465
- Levy change
- $3,029,641
- ✓ Verified
The FY2019/20 budget was adopted 4-1: Mayor Ginger Nelson and Councilmembers Freda Powell, Eddy Sauer and Howard Smith for; Councilmember Elaine Hays against.[2]
- For
- 4
- Against
- 1
· Related development
FY2020/21 rate set at $0.39681; budget adopted 5-0
The rate went from $0.38851 to $0.39681 per $100; the debt-tax rate went from $0.04976 to $0.05921 as listed in the City's statutory notice. The budget raised $1,931,428 (3.89%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 5-0.[6][4]
- ✓ Verified
FY2020/21: rate $0.39681 (prior $0.38851); no-new-revenue rate $0.38070; voter-approval rate $0.41586; debt tax rate $0.05921 (prior $0.04976).[6][4]
- Rate per 100
- $0.39681 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.38070 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.41586 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.05921 per $100
- Prior rate per 100
- $0.38851 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The FY2020/21 budget raised $1,931,428 (3.89%) more in property tax than the prior year; $528,990 from new property.[6]
- Levy change
- $1,931,428
- Levy change
- 3.89%
- New property
- $528,990
- ✓ Verified
The FY2020/21 budget was adopted 5-0 (Mayor Nelson; Councilmembers Hays, Powell, Sauer, Smith).[6]
- For
- 5
- Against
- 0
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo FY2020/21 budget document: The City's budget states the FY2020/21 increase was in the I&S portion, related to the 2016 voter-approved bond projects, the Thompson Park pool replacement, and a downtown South Johnson Street property purchase.[6]
· Starting point
Council proposes $0.48404 rate, above the voter-approval rate, triggering an election
Council voted to set a proposed ceiling of about 48 cents per $100, above the $0.44334 voter-approval rate, which under state law required a November election. Councilmember Cole Stanley was the only vote against.[7][8][9]
- ✓ Verified
For FY2021/22 the City proposed $0.48404 per $100; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.38884 and the voter-approval rate $0.44334.[8]
- Rate per 100
- $0.48404 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.38884 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.44334 per $100
- ⚠ Sources differ
The proposed increase was described as 22 percent (NewsChannel10) and 24 percent (Texas Scorecard, Amarillo Pioneer).
· Trigger
FY2021/22 budget adopted 4-1; election set for Nov 2
The FY2021/22 budget was adopted 4-1 with Councilmember Cole Stanley against. The City's materials said the proposed rate's additional revenue would fund police, fire, streets and parks; the City CFO described the election as putting the decision with voters.[8][7][11][12]
Cole StanleyGinger NelsonLaura Storrs
- ✓ Verified
The FY2021/22 budget was adopted 4-1: Mayor Ginger Nelson and Councilmembers Powell, Sauer and Smith for; Councilmember Cole Stanley against.[8]
- For
- 4
- Against
- 1
- ✓ Verified
Laura Storrs, Assistant City Manager and CFO: "Instead of our elected officials making the decision, they're putting it more in the hands of the tax payers, the voters."[11]
- ✓ Verified
Laura Storrs, Assistant City Manager and CFO (quote); NewsChannel10 (estimates): The City CFO said that under state law the rate would increase either way; NewsChannel10 estimated a $100,000 home would pay just under $8/month more if the measure passed and a little under $4/month more if it failed.[12]
- ✓ Verified
City of Amarillo FY2021/22 budget document: The City's budget states the $0.48404 rate would have generated an additional $4.8 million for Parks & Recreation capital, public safety personnel and equipment, wage increases and street improvements.[8]
- Amount
- $4,800,000
· Peak
Voters reject Proposition A; rate becomes the $0.44334 voter-approval rate
Voters rejected the proposed $0.48404 rate by a reported 55-45 margin in both Potter and Randall counties. The FY2021/22 rate became $0.44334 per $100 (the voter-approval rate), up from $0.39681.[10][9][8][4]
- ✓ Verified
Voters rejected Proposition A, the $0.48404 rate, on Nov 2, 2021, by a reported 55-45 margin, with both Potter and Randall counties voting against.[10][9][8]
- For
- 45%
- Against
- 55%
- ✓ Verified
After the failed election the FY2021/22 rate was $0.44334 per $100 (the voter-approval rate), up from $0.39681; the debt tax rate was $0.07911.[8][4][3]
- Rate per 100
- $0.44334 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.36423 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.07911 per $100
- Prior rate per 100
- $0.39681 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The FY2021/22 budget (at the revised rate) raised $7,024,921 (13.49%) more in property tax than the prior year; $702,794 from new property.[8]
- Levy change
- $7,024,921
- Levy change
- 13.49%
- New property
- $702,794
· Related development
FY2022/23 rate set at $0.40628 (4-0)
Council approved the FY2022/23 budget and rate 4-0 (one member absent). The rate went from $0.44334 to $0.40628 per $100 ($0.07549 debt service). Council had earlier considered a rate near 49 cents that included Civic Center renovation funding.[13][14][4]
- ✓ Verified
The FY2022/23 rate is reported as 40 cents (ABC7) and $0.40628 per $100 (City).
Reported value 1[13]
- Rate per 100
- $0.40000 per $100
Rounded in news coverage ('4-cents lower than the current rate')
- ✓ Verified
The FY2022/23 budget and rate were approved 4-0, with Councilmember Eddy Sauer absent.[13][14]
- For
- 4
- Against
- 0
- Absent
- 1
- ✓ Verified
The FY2022/23 budget raised $1,587,957 (2.62%) more in property tax than the prior year; $740,251 from new property.[14]
- Levy change
- $1,587,957
- Levy change
- 2.62%
- New property
- $740,251
- ✓ Verified
Council had earlier considered a rate of about 49 cents that included Civic Center renovation funding; ABC7 reported that project was tied up in litigation.[13]
· Related development
FY2023/24 rate set at $0.39195 (5-0)
The rate went from $0.40628 to $0.39195 per $100 ($0.07751 debt service). The budget raised $4,026,731 (6.46%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 5-0; the same budget included fee increases in several utilities and services.[15][16][4]
Cole StanleyLes SimpsonJosh CraftDon Tipps
- ✓ Verified
FY2023/24: rate $0.39195 (prior $0.40628); no-new-revenue $0.37598; voter-approval $0.39867; debt tax rate $0.07751.[15][4][16]
- Rate per 100
- $0.39195 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.31444 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.07751 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.37598 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.39867 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The FY2023/24 budget raised $4,026,731 (6.46%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,388,601 from new property.[15]
- Levy change
- $4,026,731
- Levy change
- 6.46%
- New property
- $1,388,601
- ✓ Verified
The FY2023/24 budget was adopted 5-0 (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Josh Craft, Don Tipps, Tom Scherlen, Les Simpson).[15][16]
- For
- 5
- Against
- 0
- ✓ Verified
The FY2023/24 budget included fee increases for drainage, solid waste, sewer, water, environmental health, golf, tennis, aquatics, zoo admission, athletics and city marshal.[16]
· Related development
FY2024/25 rate set at $0.38723 (4-0)
The rate went from $0.39195 to $0.38723 per $100 ($0.31867 M&O, $0.06856 debt service), equal to that year's voter-approval rate. The budget raised $3,654,631 (5.43%) more in property tax than the prior year. Council adopted it 4-0 with one member absent.[17][18]
Cole StanleyLes SimpsonJosh CraftDon Tipps
- ✓ Verified
FY2024/25: rate $0.38723 ($0.31867 M&O, $0.06856 debt); no-new-revenue $0.36659; voter-approval $0.38723.[17][18]
- Rate per 100
- $0.38723 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.31867 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.06856 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.36659 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.38723 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The FY2024/25 budget raised $3,654,631 (5.43%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,279,505 from new property.[17]
- Levy change
- $3,654,631
- Levy change
- 5.43%
- New property
- $1,279,505
- ✓ Verified
The 2024 statutory notice lists $12,853,341 in tax-supported debt service, less $1,653,515 excess prior-year collections, for a total debt levy of $11,199,827.[18]
- Debt service
- $12,853,341
- Debt levy
- $11,199,827
- ✓ Verified
The FY2024/25 budget was adopted 4-0 (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Josh Craft, Don Tipps, Tom Scherlen), with Councilmember Les Simpson absent.[17]
- For
- 4
- Against
- 0
- Absent
- 1
· Related development
FY2025/26 rate set at $0.43070 (5-0)
Council unanimously adopted a $0.43070 rate (from $0.38723), equal to the voter-approval rate; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.37355. The debt-service part went from $0.06856 to $0.09956 and the M&O part from $0.31867 to $0.33114. The budget notice states property-tax revenue rises $8,475,975 (11.77%).[19][20][3][21][22]
Cole StanleyLes SimpsonTim ReidDon TippsDavid PrescottLaura Storrs
- ✓ Verified
FY2025/26: rate $0.43070 ($0.33114 M&O, $0.09956 debt); no-new-revenue $0.37355; voter-approval $0.43070; prior rate $0.38723.[19][3]
- Rate per 100
- $0.43070 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.33114 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.09956 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.37355 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.43070 per $100
- Prior rate per 100
- $0.38723 per $100
- ✓ Verified
From FY2024/25 to FY2025/26 the debt-service part went from $0.06856 to $0.09956 (+$0.03100) and the M&O part from $0.31867 to $0.33114 (+$0.01247).[3]
- Is change per 100
- $0.03100 per $100
- Mo change per 100
- $0.01247 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The FY2025/26 property-tax increase is stated as $8,475,975 (11.77%) in the budget notice, $8.4 million (11.77%) by the City release, and nearly $8.5 million by NewsChannel10; the hearing notice's total levy on all properties rises $7,648,192 (10.58%).
Reported value 1[3]
- Levy change
- $8,475,975
- Levy change
- 11.77%
- New property
- $1,245,224
LGC 102.007 budget notice: revenue from property taxes vs last year's budget
Reported value 3[21]
- Levy change
- $8,500,000
- Comparator
- approximately
NewsChannel10 ('nearly $8.5 million')
Reported value 4[19]
- Levy total prior
- $72,268,651
- Levy total
- $79,916,843
- Levy change
- $7,648,192
- Levy change
- 10.58%
Truth-in-taxation hearing notice: total tax levy on all properties, 2024 vs 2025 tax year
- ✓ Verified
The 2025 hearing notice estimates City tax on the average homestead going from $838.28 to $975.36 (+$137.08, 16.35%), with average homestead taxable value rising from $216,481 to $226,040.[19]
- Prior
- $838
- Amount
- $975
- Change
- $137
- Change
- 16.35%
- ✓ Verified
The FY2025/26 budget and tax rate were adopted unanimously (Mayor Cole Stanley; Councilmembers Tim Reid, Don Tipps, David Prescott, Les Simpson) on Sept 16, 2025.[20][3][19][21]
- For
- 5
- Against
- 0
- ✓ Verified
Mayor Cole Stanley: "The money is there, it's now stewardship."[21]
- ✓ Verified
Councilmember David Prescott: "Costs have gone up, they're going up in areas that we never expected."[21]
· Trigger
Staff propose a $0.44728 voter-approval rate for FY2026/27; NNR is $0.42170
At a budget workshop, staff proposed the voter-approval rate of $0.44728; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.42170. Councilmember Les Simpson asked to explore the budget at the no-new-revenue rate. Coverage reported total City debt of $566.8 million, about half for water and sewer.[23]
Les SimpsonCole StanleyGrayson Path
- ✓ Verified
Staff proposed the $0.44728 voter-approval rate for the 2026 tax year; the no-new-revenue rate was $0.42170, below the 2025 rate of $0.43070.[23]
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.44728 per $100
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.42170 per $100
- ✓ Verified
The Tribune reported total City debt of $566.8 million, almost 50% for water and sewer, with annual debt service at 10.8% of the proposed budget and about $7.3 million rolling off after FY2026/27.[23][24]
- Amount
- $566,800,000
· Related development
Rates recalculated after errors in figures sent to tax offices; ceiling set at $0.4307
At a special meeting, staff presented recalculated rates after errors were found in numbers used to calculate them (debt figures, a fleet debt item, and a TIRZ value deduction). The voter-approval rate rose to $0.45252; the no-new-revenue rate stayed $0.42170. After several failed motions, council set a not-to-exceed rate of $0.4307 (Stanley, Reid and Tipps for; Simpson against all motions).[24][25]
Cole StanleyLes SimpsonTim ReidDon TippsDavid PrescottAndrew Freeman
- ✓ Verified
The Tribune reported the original rates used debt collection numbers more than $2 million too high, counted $1.1 million in fee-paid fleet debt in general revenue, and double-deducted TIRZ value (about $1.2 million for the upcoming budget).[24]
- ✓ Verified
After recalculation the no-new-revenue rate stayed $0.42170 and the voter-approval rate rose $0.00508 to $0.45252.[24]
- No new revenue rate per 100
- $0.42170 per $100
- Voter approval rate per 100
- $0.45252 per $100
- ✓ Verified
Potter County Tax Assessor-Collector: The Potter County tax assessor-collector said the incorrect number appeared, based on his office's internal research, to have been provided by City staff.[24]
- ✓ Verified
Mayor Cole Stanley: "They were essentially taking that value and deducting it from our revenues twice."[24]
- ✓ Verified
Simpson's motion to cap the rate at the no-new-revenue rate got no second; after three failed motions, Stanley, Reid and Don Tipps voted to set the not-to-exceed rate at $0.4307. Simpson voted against every motion.[24][25]
- Not to exceed rate per 100
- $0.43070 per $100
- ✓ Verified
Councilmember Les Simpson: "I really think we owe it to the taxpayers to provide relief to them and that's the budget I'm going to be looking for."[25]
· Resolution
FY2026/27 rate adopted at $0.43070 (4-1)
Council adopted the FY2026/27 budget and a $0.43070 rate ($0.32412 M&O, $0.10658 debt service), the same total as FY2025/26, by 4-1 votes with Councilmember Les Simpson against. The City says the budget raises $2,063,963 (2.58%) more in property tax, including $1,295,675 from new property.[26][27][28]
- ⚠ Sources differ
The FY2026/27 rate is $0.43070 per $100, the same total as FY2025/26; the proposed budget book and the adoption release give different M&O/I&S splits.
- Rate per 100
- $0.43070 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.32412 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.10658 per $100
Adopted split, City release of Sept 30, 2026 (also ABC7)
Reported value 2[29]
- Rate per 100
- $0.43070 per $100
- Mo rate per 100
- $0.33714 per $100
- Is rate per 100
- $0.09356 per $100
Proposed budget book dated 09-24-26 (before final adoption)
- ✓ Verified
The FY2026/27 budget raises $2,063,963 (2.58%) more in property tax than the prior year; $1,295,675 from new property. The City says the rate will effectively be raised by 2.9 percent and raise M&O taxes on a $100,000 home by about $9.[26][29][28]
- Levy change
- $2,063,963
- Levy change
- 2.58%
- New property
- $1,295,675
- ✓ Verified
All FY2026/27 budget and tax-rate votes were 4-1, with Councilmember Les Simpson against.[26][27]
- For
- 4
- Against
- 1
- ✓ Verified
The debt-service (I&S/I&R) part of the City rate went from $0.02374 per $100 in FY2016/17 to $0.10658 in FY2026/27.[3][26]
- Is rate fy2016 17 per 100
- $0.02374 per $100
- Is rate fy2024 25 per 100
- $0.06856 per $100
- Is rate fy2025 26 per 100
- $0.09956 per $100
- Is rate fy2026 27 per 100
- $0.10658 per $100
- ✓ Verified
Texas Comptroller data record City of Amarillo general obligation principal of $123,738,733 in FY2016 and $212,736,000 in FY2025 ($622.91 and $1,044.21 per capita).[30]
- Go principal fy2016
- $123,738,733
- Go principal fy2025
- $212,736,000
- Per capita fy2016
- $623
- Per capita fy2025
- $1,044
Related storylines: Financing the Amarillo Civic Center expansion and renovation (2016-2026)Amarillo's wastewater plants: failures, enforcement, expansion financing and rate increases (2022-2026)Moving Amarillo City Hall into the renovated Amarillo Hardware building (2016-2025)Downtown TIRZ #1 and Local Government Corporation financing (2006-2026)