· Starting point
Council discusses a forensic audit and directs the audit committee to vet third-party firms
The council discussed the scope of a possible forensic audit covering capital improvement projects, water and sewer, and ARPA funds. The audit committee said it would vet and recommend a third-party firm to the full council before any forensic audit proceeds; staff were directed to call a special meeting in August. Some council members said they had not seen issues with funds.[1][2]
What the sources say
- ✓ Verified
On July 14, 2026 the council discussed a possible forensic audit including capital improvement projects, sewer and water, and ARPA funds. NewsChannel 10 reported that for months council members and citizens had raised questions about past financial records, including where funds came from and where they went.[1]
- ✓ Verified
The audit committee said it would vet and recommend a third-party firm to bring before the full council before any forensic audit moves forward, and the council directed staff to call a special meeting in August. No vote count was reported.[1]
- ✓ Verified
Mayor Cole Stanley: Mayor Cole Stanley described a forensic audit as 'a formalized audit that digs down deep without some handcuffs' and said the firm should be able to review 'everything years past.'[1]
- ✓ Verified
Councilmember Les Simpson: Councilmember Les Simpson said, 'To me, it doesn't matter if it costs $1 or $200,000. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing. If it's not, it's not.' This was a hypothetical range, not a cost estimate; no cost estimate for the forensic audit was reported.[1]
- ✓ Verified
Some council members said they had not heard or seen any issues with the funds and did not wish to spend money on an audit they considered unnecessary; supporters said it was needed to rebuild trust and ensure financial transparency.[1]
- ✓ Verified
No source reviewed reports an allegation by the City or its auditors of missing funds or wrongdoing. The fiscal 2022, 2024 and 2025 auditor's reports state unmodified opinions (the opinion page of the scanned fiscal 2023 report is not legible), and the City has not publicly stated that the earlier restatements or the software change led to the forensic audit; reported reasons were questions about past financial records, the $43 million CIP figure and the new CFO. The fiscal 2025 single audit's nine federal-program findings report no questioned costs.[1][3][4][5][6][7]
- ✓ Verified
The City's boards page describes the Council Audit Committee as two councilmembers, the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and a member of the AEDC, Amarillo Hospital District, Amarillo-Potter Events Venue District or Amarillo Local Government Corporation board, serving as an advisory committee to the City Council regarding financial information, financial reports and communications with the City's independent auditors. It lists the enacting authority as '04-05-16-2; rev. 12-14-21-1', five members and three-year terms.[8]
- ✓ Verified
The July 14, 2026 minutes list discussion items 4.1, 'Discussion of roles and responsibilities of Council Audit Committee,' and 4.2, 'Discussion of definition for potential forensic audit scope to include CIP projects, sewer and water, and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) monies'; each records that Mayor Stanley introduced and presented the item. No vote is recorded on either item.[2]